The reason

• During acute MI   hemodynamics  are precariously balanced.We do not know yet how  emergency multivessel plasty alters this .
• Our  initial aim should be   confined to myocardial salvage in the IRA . Total myocardial revascularization is niether  the  priority nor its desirable.
• The more  time  you spend  within the inflamed coronary artery , more its  hazardous.
• Multiple stenting  is prone for thrombus   and  migration  into side branch .
• Stent opposition is sub optimal in many thrombus infested lesions.

Still  . . .  in real world it is extremely difficult to curtail the urge to stent  all eligible lesion during primary PCI !

How to avoid it ? 

If the patient is poor or the insurance limit is low , the issue  of multi vessel stenting does not arise at all  !

Always  ignore  complex  non IRA lesions  during primary  PCI. Be happy if a non IRA has a bifurcation lesion !

Still , some lovely looking lesions in non IRA  would be  tempting  and inviting .  Indulge at your own risk !

* Please remember if  the proximal  LAD  has a non IRA lesion , it may be sensible to attempt  simultaneous revascularisation even if the patient is stable !

Other unrealistic advice

• Keep the professional fee and other benefits   fixed whether  we do a single or multiple   vessel stenting (Realise  . . .  surgeons do not charge more for a  4  vessel by-pass graft  than a single  ! )
• Keep the current AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines pasted right next to the fluroscopy monitor .
• Ask your subordinates to repeatedly caution   you  about the possible  excesses and ask them to wave a red flag !
• You may  empower the   senior staff nurse   with a veto power  to shut off the cath lab once IRA plasty is  completed and the patient  is stable.
• In extreme  situations , keep a cath  marshal ready to manually evacuate  the primary operator  from cath lab !

Reference

It remains a mystery  why left brain  is   blessed with a  separate  origin ,  while right has to share it with blood meant for hand  .It is beyond science  . . . isn’t

It is possible the left hemisphere  of brain   has more   purpose   to be alive  ,  with bulk of the cognition work to do . Hence   God created a  separate  supply to it !  Of course , he  would   have never  thought ,  the  possibility of  his ” mean” creations   adventuring  within the   arterial tree  !

Click over the Image for animation

Please remember  whenever  we   play with   catheters and wires  through   radial route , we  are  hugging  and scraping   the artery meant  for cerebral circulation !

Final message

Femoral Interventions  enjoys a proven  track record. Currently ,  radial route has virtually taken over with  few  advantages . However , the  overall stroke risk in the two approaches  remain  low but genuine (.4 %) .It may be true , arch manipulation is more  with  femoral but  the threat to  vertebral and brachiocephalic circulation  is more with radial .  When the available evidence are  not conclusive  and  new ones are not forth coming  . . . it is wiser to rely on common sense !

Reference

The shunt  begins  from left  atrium  and goes on to complete a circuit.

LA——-ASD———RA————RV———-PA———-PVs———LA

In this circuit all chambers  enlarge except the LA . (Inspite of the fact about 200-300 % cardiac output traverses this chamber )

Why ?

Post -test

The most popular answer in the above poll  is LA is  a transit chamber .

If it is so . . .  RA is equally  a transit chamber ,  why it enlarges significantly ?

1. Thrombolysis
2. Primary PCI
3. Rescue PCI
4. Facilitated PCI
5. Pharmaco -Invasive approach
6. CABG

*CABG is rarely used except in  severe mechanical complication.

There is some  issues in differentiating  facilitated PCI and  Pharmaco Invasive Approach.

What do we facilitate ? How we do it ?

PCI in acute STEMI is done in a thrombotic milleu. So we get sub optimal results .Hence to facilitate it we try using

either 2B-3A antagonists, Newer Heparins, or even thrombolytic agents before submitting them for PCI

Where is this facilitation done ?

Facilitated PCI is done in small hospitals where  there  is no cath lab or cath lab is available only during office hours.

Facilitation can be done in either in same hospital or on the way to big hospital

Is there a time window to start  this ?

The main aim was to was to facilitate the PCI .Hence time window was not considered vital in few studies (Wrongly though !) ideally it should be started as early as the first contact . Since facilitation can be started earlier the time window is 0-24 hours .

What happened to the concept of f-PCI ?

It died a premature death  and  last rites were  completed when the FINNESE trial was out .

But it left behind a daughter concept ie in selected patients if the facilitation is done early , especially in those patients who are going to get the subsequent PCI late ,or in high risk individuals  , the initial  pharmacological facilitation* was indeed useful.)

*If  facilitation was with   fibrinolytic agents (Not 2a/2b )  .It is very important the benefits of facilitation is mainly  attributed to the time gain in achieving partial opening of IRA  making it more complete salvage of the subsequent PCI .

This aspect later on named as PIA .

Pharmaco- invasive approach(PIA)

We know p PCI is a race against time .We also  know fibrinolytic therapy  fares well in this race  but   pPCI  beats in   effectiveness  .

So what prevents us to combine the swiftness the fibrinolysis and the robustness of pPCI ?  That is  like getting the best of both world .( It is not that easy thing accomplish after all 1+1 in medicine is rarely 2 !)

In it’s core principle it  is same as f-PCI . But facilitation is done only with fibrinolytic agent (Not 2B-3A) . Pharmaco Invasive strategy can be started in any small hospital/ In the ambulance /. It  is routinely followed by PCI whether the initial thrombolysis is successful or not . PIA should not be done before 3 hours window if  a timely pPCI is feasible.  Hence PIA has a typical time window of 3-24 hours .

Summary

f-PCI is combining  various anti-platelet and fibrinlytic strategy prior to PCI . It was found  to be useless if it is used routinely in all cases of pPCI. (Rather 2B-3A  was useful  if  only the facilitation was done within the cath lab to prevent procedure related issues) .Time window can be between 0-24h .

Pharmaco Invasive approach (PIA)   is actually a type of f-PCI where  fibrinolytic agents are used routinely which is followed by mandatory angiogram and PCI in all deserving cases.Many still  believe the facilitation in PIA is primarily accured in  shortening the   time to reperfusion  rather than altering the thrombus load and morphology  ! Time window is usually between 3-24 hours.

We  can deliver a huge aortic valve and fix it with wires .

But  . . . we have no proper  preformed   guiding catheter  that can  sit into RCA ostium directly   and snugly  for a long time to enable complex RCA angioplasties !

An now try this one .

Here is  a  pending patent for  a preformed RCA catheter

If atrial booster pump is lost (which is said to be 25 % of  LV filling )  suddenly one expects dramatic symptoms  especially if there is associated LV dysfunction or aortic valve disease .

But in real world AF is well tolerated arrhythmia in most  .  We know by land  mark trials AF  is as good as sinus rhythm  if the rate is  is under control

This is a definite evidence the AF  may not compromise  LV filling   even if   it nullifies  the  atrial contractility .

There is one  more evidence for  retention of atrial mechanical activity in spite of AF .It is well recognised , pre-systolic accentuation is preserved  in many cases of mitral stenosis with AF.

*Crazy hemodynamics : For an attached LA clot to  dislodge ,   one needs some amount of LA contraction isn’t ?  Unfortunately  a fibrillating  atria always  tend to  have this one ! This again is a senseless  proof for some  mechanical activity of LA during AF !

How is this possible ?

Is it a  purely volume dependent filling   ? ( Or )  is it  the  Intrinsic LA starling forces that do not depend electrical atrial activation .

This is definitely an  issue to ponder over . A good LV contraction makes the atria empty more completely . This would  somehow  mean , LV relaxation  is facilitating atrial function . During  AF the LV  handles effectively  the additional burden  imposed by the loss of   25  %  booster pump of atria ( Accelerated LV relaxation ? )  A  constantly  changing  RR interval makes LV diastolic function a more complex event .

Final message

Atrial fibrillation is  a well tolerated  arrhythmia in vast  majority of patients  . This  implies either of the two things.

1. The so called  physiological atrial  booster pump is redundant  or dispensable in otherwise healthy heart
2. The booster pump is indeed important  . . . but it is less  affected by AF as long as the rate is under control !

It is to be  strongly emphasized , Heart rate and  LV function  will ultimately determine  , how one is going to tolerate the AF  !

It is  a small gesture  from LV  to LA  at it’s hour of crisis  . . . in return  for  it’s lifetime assistance  as a booster pump ! 

Postamble

How  rate control  prevails over rhythm control in spite  zero atrial contractility in the  former  ?

Comments welcome !

//

An animated version

In HCM every myocyte is  genetically made  defective . Myofibrils are in disarray every where . Still , can we identify some vulnerable zones that acts as arrhythmic  focus ? If that is possible , we  have a opportunity to abate that focus .

In HOCM  , which is the most stressed area ? LVOT ?  Septum, ? When we say stress , it can mean either mechanical or electrical .

Does electrical instability involve the same zone as mechanical stress ?

How often VT originate from LVOT in HCM ?  For this we have good clinical model _, the patients who underwent alcohol septal ablation.

What happens to the incidence of VT  post septal  ablation  ?

“It is reported  post septal ablation the incidence of SCD  becomes  equal to general population” (Read the paper below )

If that is true , it is obvious the  arrhythmic  focus is also ablated along with LVOT myocardium .

Though many studies claim  so !  It  fails to convince us  .  HOCM is a diffuse disease of  myocardium.  Even a cluster of myocyte disarray  with fibrosis   can be a future focus  irrespective of it’s location .

However ,  it is always possible relieving the mechanical stress of the LV can definitely reduce the likelihood of an electrical event .(Even if the arrhythmic focus is intact elsewhere !)

* We know RVOT is  developmentally arrhythmia prone zone . We also know HCM involves RVOT (After all ,  IVS  is legally shared by both ventricles !  ) . Some of  the monomorphic  VTs with LBBB morphology may originate from RVOT in HCM .

Management of recurrent VT in HOCM

• Drugs (Amiodarone/ Calclum blockers/ Beta blockers/Disopyramide)
• ICD- (Probably mainstay  )
• Very rarely ablation (If localised focus is well documented )

Reference

1.A case report for successful ablation of  VT in HOCM   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9255687

2.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23076968

//

How  intelligent is this traditional classification of HT  ?

The incidence of primary and secondary  HT varies depending  upon the level of investigation we do . One of my  regular patient  who gets to me for  HT .He  is 42 year old man  works in financial institution  with lots of work stress and he was marginally obese as well .  He was investigated for all known cause of secondary HT and every parameter  was found to be normal and was being treated as   primary HT.

When he was about to leave my clinic he  bowled  this google !

Doctor , why do  you call  mine as  primary HT   ?  . . . When you yourself  say  my stress and weight is responsible for  high blood pressure ?

Valid question is it not !  . .  . I told him   “somehow”  ,   we have not  been taught   in medical schools  , to consider stress  of life  as a factor  responsible for  developing secondary  HT !

Final message

Strange  definitions in medicine continue .  Not every one with high stress  levels develop HT  .There  are  some unknown factors operating  .Till we know that we  will keep calling them as primary HT .

( Who  knows the  man  who raised this question  may   show up  with adrenal hyperplasia  or a renal parenchymal dysfunction 5  years down the lane !)

We live by perceived  knowledge  on a moment to moment basis  ! . Ignorance  tries  to lock the doors of knowledge .

But we  continue to open new doors . That is the  only  purpose of medical research !